Responsibilities:
- Overall feedback strategy
- Process definition
- Team coordination
- Stakeholder reporting
- Tool administration
Time Commitment: 10-15 hours/weekResponsibilities:
- Daily review of new submissions
- Initial categorization
- Duplicate detection
- First response
- Escalation of urgent items
Time Commitment: 1-2 hours/day
Rotation: Recommended for coverageResponsibilities:
- Roadmap alignment
- Feature prioritization
- Status decisions
- Strategic communication
- Backlog linking
Time Commitment: 5-10 hours/weekResponsibilities:
- Technical feasibility assessment
- Effort estimation
- Implementation tracking
- Bug prioritization
- Technical communication
Time Commitment: 3-5 hours/weekResponsibilities:
- Customer-specific feedback review
- Account health monitoring
- Proactive outreach
- Feedback solicitation
- Closure communication
Time Commitment: 5-8 hours/weekAgenda Item: Feedback Review (5 minutes)
- New critical items
- Rising trends
- Urgent customer requests
- Blockers in workflowMeeting: Feedback Review (30-60 minutes)
Attendees: Product, Engineering, CS
Agenda:
1. Review top voted items
2. Discuss rising trends
3. Update roadmap links
4. Assign ownership
5. Set priorities for weekMeeting: Feedback Strategy (60-90 minutes)
Attendees: Leadership, Product, Engineering
Agenda:
1. Trend analysis
2. Segment insights
3. Roadmap validation
4. Process improvements
5. Resource allocation✅ Assign category
✅ Set initial status
✅ Tag if duplicate
✅ Respond with template
✅ Escalate if critical✅ Read full description
✅ Review user history
✅ Search for duplicates
✅ Assess feasibility
✅ Add detailed notes
✅ Link to related itemsFast: High volume, clear items
Deep: Complex requests, VIP customers, strategic itemsNew Item Received
├─ Is it spam/invalid?
│ └─ Yes → Delete/Archive
│ └─ No → Continue
├─ Is it a duplicate?
│ └─ Yes → Link to original, notify user
│ └─ No → Continue
├─ Is it critical/urgent?
│ └─ Yes → Escalate immediately
│ └─ No → Continue
├─ Assign category
├─ Set status
└─ Respond to userSubject: Thank you for your feedback!
Hi [Name],
Thank you for submitting your [idea/issue]! We've received
it and our team will review it shortly.
We'll keep you updated on the status. In the meantime, you
can track progress at [link].
Best regards,
[Team Name]Subject: Update on your feedback: [Title]
Hi [Name],
Great news! We've started work on your [idea/issue]. It's
currently [status] and we expect to [complete/resolve] it
by [timeframe].
You can follow the progress here: [link]
Thanks for your patience!
[Team Name]Subject: Your feedback is live!
Hi [Name],
The [feature/fix] you requested is now available! You can
find it in [location/version].
Thank you for helping us improve [product]. We'd love to
hear your thoughts on the implementation.
[Link to release notes]
Best regards,
[Team Name]Subject: Update on your feedback: [Title]
Hi [Name],
Thank you for your suggestion about [topic]. After careful
consideration, we've decided not to pursue this at this time
because [reason].
We appreciate your input and encourage you to continue sharing
your ideas. Every submission helps us understand our customers
better.
[Alternative solution if applicable]
Best regards,
[Team Name]✅ Use nouns, not verbs
✅ Be specific but not too narrow
✅ Avoid overlapping categories
✅ Use consistent terminology- Authentication
- Reporting
- Mobile Experience
- Performance
- Integrations- "Make it better" (too vague)
- "Fix bugs" (too broad)
- "Speed up the app" (too specific)
- "Other" (catch-all, avoid if possible)Create internal guide:
- Category definitions
- Example items for each
- When to use each category
- Edge case decisions
- Review and update quarterlyFrequency: Monthly newsletter
Content:
- Top implemented features
- Items in progress
- Trending requests
- How to submit feedbackWhen: Major features ship
Channel: Email, in-app, blog
Content:
- What shipped
- Which feedback it addresses
- How to use it
- Thank contributorsTarget: Low-engagement segments
Message: "We'd love to hear from you!"
Incentive: Highlight how feedback shapes product
Follow-up: Personal calls for key accounts- Shows customers they're heard
- Builds trust and loyalty
- Encourages future feedback
- Demonstrates customer-driven developmentAutomated: Email when status changes
Manual: Personal note for VIP customers
Frequency: Every major milestoneRelease Notes: "Thanks to [users] for suggesting this!"
In-App: "Requested by customers like you"
Social Media: Highlight customer-driven featuresAfter shipping: "Does this solve your problem?"
Beta Access: Invite requesters to test early
Feedback Loop: Iterate based on validationIf declined: Explain why, suggest alternatives
If delayed: Explain constraints, set expectations
If modified: Explain changes from original request- Total feedback items
- New submissions per week
- Growth rate
- Submissions by segment
- Submissions by category- Average votes per item
- Comment activity
- User participation rate
- Segment engagement scores
- Repeat submitters- Time to first response
- Time to triage
- Unprocessed percentage
- Backlog link rate
- Closure rate- Features shipped from feedback
- Issues resolved
- Customer satisfaction (proxy)
- Feedback-to-feature ratio
- Implementation velocitySpecific: "Reduce average response time"
Measurable: "From 8 hours to 4 hours"
Achievable: Based on team capacity
Relevant: Improves customer experience
Time-bound: "Within 3 months"Current: 8 hours
Target: 4 hours (50% improvement)
Timeline: 3 months
Action: Dedicated responder, templatesCurrent: 25%
Target: 40%
Timeline: 6 months
Action: Simplified linking, team trainingCurrent: 30%
Target: <15%
Timeline: 2 months
Action: Daily triage, additional resourcesAudience: Triage team
Format: Quick email/Slack
Content: New items, urgent issuesAudience: Product, Engineering, CS
Format: Dashboard + summary
Content: Trends, priorities, actionsAudience: Leadership
Format: Presentation + report
Content: Strategy, outcomes, ROIAudience: Executive team
Format: Business review
Content: Impact, trends, investment needsCustomers submit feedback but never hear back
Result: Decreased submissions, lost trust✅ Automated acknowledgment emails
✅ Regular status updates
✅ Clear SLAs for response
✅ Transparency about decisions
✅ Close the loop on all itemsToo much time analyzing, not enough action
Result: Slow response, missed opportunities✅ Set time limits for triage
✅ Use 80/20 rule (focus on top 20%)
✅ Bias toward action
✅ Iterate and improve
✅ Don't let perfect be enemy of goodOnly building highest-voted features
Result: Neglect of important but niche needs✅ Balance votes with strategy
✅ Consider segment importance
✅ Evaluate business impact
✅ Don't ignore low-vote strategic items
✅ Use multiple prioritization factorsToo many categories, inconsistent use
Result: Poor filtering, unclear trends✅ Limit to 8-15 categories
✅ Clear category definitions
✅ Regular category audits
✅ Team training on categorization
✅ Merge overlapping categoriesSame issue submitted multiple times
Result: Inflated counts, wasted effort✅ Search before submit (user education)
✅ Similar items detection
✅ Regular duplicate cleanup
✅ Merge duplicates promptly
✅ Link related itemsItems linked to backlog but never completed
Result: Broken promises, customer frustration✅ Only link when work truly starts
✅ Update status regularly
✅ Unlink if work cancelled
✅ Communicate delays
✅ Track completion metrics- Simple workflow
- Manual triage
- Weekly reviews
- Focus on high-impact items
- Personal touch in communication- Basic categorization
- Email notifications
- Spreadsheet tracking
- Minimal automation- Defined processes
- Role specialization
- Daily triage rotation
- Automated workflows
- Segment-based prioritization- Advanced filtering
- Integration with PM tools
- Automated notifications
- Basic analytics- Sophisticated workflows
- Dedicated feedback team
- Multi-tier triage
- Heavy automation
- Advanced analytics- Full integration suite
- Custom dashboards
- AI-assisted categorization
- Predictive analytics
- Enterprise reporting1. Automated categorization (AI/rules)
2. Priority queue (critical first)
3. Batch processing (similar items)
4. Distributed team (time zones)
5. Escalation paths (urgent items)- Bulk actions
- Keyboard shortcuts
- Response templates
- Auto-assignment rules
- Smart notificationsQuestions to Ask:
1. Are we responding fast enough?
2. Is categorization consistent?
3. Are we linking enough items?
4. Is the backlog aligned with feedback?
5. Are customers satisfied with communication?- Response time trends
- Unprocessed percentage
- Backlog link rate
- Closure rate
- Customer satisfaction- Identify bottlenecks
- Update processes
- Train team
- Adjust resources
- Set new targetsFrequency: Monthly
Attendees: All feedback team members
Format: Start/Stop/Continue
Questions:
- What's working well?
- What's not working?
- What should we try?
- What should we stop?Examples:
- Simplify category structure
- Add response templates
- Automate status updates
- Improve search functionality
- Better integration with JiraAsk customers:
- Is it easy to submit feedback?
- Do you feel heard?
- Are updates timely?
- Is the process transparent?
- What would improve the experience?- In-app survey
- Email survey
- User interviews
- NPS follow-up
- Community forumsAverage response time: 12 hours
Target: 4 hours1. Dedicated responder role
2. Response templates created
3. Real-time notifications
4. SLA tracking dashboardMonth 1: 8 hours (33% improvement)
Month 2: 5 hours (58% improvement)
Month 3: 3.5 hours (71% improvement)- Templates save significant time
- Dedicated ownership crucial
- Visibility drives accountability
- Continuous monitoring neededBacklog link rate: 18%
Target: 40%1. Simplified linking workflow
2. Team training sessions
3. Weekly linking reviews
4. Linking targets setMonth 1: 22% (+4pp)
Month 2: 28% (+10pp)
Month 3: 35% (+17pp)
Month 4: 42% (+24pp)- Process simplification critical
- Training drives adoption
- Regular reviews maintain focus
- Targets motivate teamFree tier segment: 5.0 engagement score
Target: 15.01. Targeted email campaign
2. In-app prompts for feedback
3. Incentives for participation
4. Simplified submission processMonth 1: 7.5 (+50%)
Month 2: 11.0 (+120%)
Month 3: 14.5 (+190%)- Awareness is half the battle
- Reduce friction to submit
- Incentives work
- Sustained effort required