Beyond the basic dashboard metrics, Feedback Manager provides rich data for deep analysis. This guide covers advanced analytics techniques, trend identification, custom reporting, and how to use feedback data for strategic product decisions.
Quantitative Metrics:
Qualitative Data:
Metadata:
Tracking Submission Patterns:
Daily Volume:
Analysis: Count submissions per day
Pattern: Identify spikes or drops
Action: Investigate causes
Weekly Patterns:
Monday: Often highest (weekend accumulation)
Friday: Often lower (end of week)
Weekend: Typically lowest
Monthly Cycles:
Month-end: May spike (quarter/month reviews)
Post-release: Spike after product launches
Holiday periods: Typically lower
Calculating Growth Rate:
Growth Rate = ((Current Period - Previous Period) / Previous Period) × 100
Example:
Last month: 150 items
This month: 180 items
Growth: ((180 - 150) / 150) × 100 = 20%
Vote Velocity Analysis:
Rising Items Detection:
Velocity = Votes in Last 7 Days / Total Days Since Creation
High Velocity (>5 votes/day): Trending
Medium Velocity (2-5 votes/day): Growing interest
Low Velocity (<2 votes/day): Stable
Engagement Decay:
Pattern: Items get most votes in first 30 days
Analysis: Compare vote rate over time
Action: Re-surface old valuable items
Comment Activity:
Active Discussion: >5 comments in last 7 days
Moderate Activity: 2-5 comments
Low Activity: <2 comments
Dormant: No comments in 30+ days
Category Distribution Analysis:
Current Distribution:
Feature Requests: 45%
Bug Reports: 30%
Performance: 15%
UI/UX: 10%
Trend Over Time:
Month 1: Bugs 50%, Features 30%
Month 2: Bugs 40%, Features 40%
Month 3: Bugs 30%, Features 45%
Interpretation: Product stabilizing, users requesting features
Emerging Categories:
New category gaining >5% share in 30 days
Example: "Mobile" category growing from 2% to 12%
Action: Investigate mobile-specific issues
Engagement Score Changes:
Month-over-Month:
Enterprise: 50.0 → 55.0 (+10% improvement)
SMB: 32.0 → 28.0 (-12.5% decline)
Free Tier: 8.0 → 12.0 (+50% improvement)
Interpretation:
Segment Shift Analysis:
Track which segments are growing/shrinking
Identify segments changing behavior
Correlate with product changes or campaigns
Week-over-Week:
Metric: Total Feedback
This week: 45 items
Last week: 38 items
Change: +7 items (+18.4%)
Month-over-Month:
Metric: Average Response Time
This month: 4.2 hours
Last month: 5.8 hours
Change: -1.6 hours (-27.6% improvement)
Year-over-Year:
Metric: Backlog Link Rate
This year: 35%
Last year: 22%
Change: +13 percentage points (+59% improvement)
Submission Cohorts:
Definition:
Group feedback by submission month
Track lifecycle metrics for each cohort
Example Analysis:
January Cohort (100 items):
- 30 days: 20% linked to backlog
- 60 days: 45% linked to backlog
- 90 days: 60% linked to backlog
- 120 days: 65% completed
February Cohort (120 items):
- 30 days: 25% linked (improvement!)
- 60 days: 50% linked
- 90 days: 70% linked
Insights:
User Segment Cohorts:
Track engagement by segment over time
Identify which segments stay engaged
Measure retention and churn patterns
Internal Benchmarks:
Your Product A: 4.2h avg response time
Your Product B: 6.5h avg response time
Target: Match Product A performance
Industry Benchmarks:
Your Performance: 4.2h avg response time
Industry Average: 8-12h
Your Position: Top quartile
Best-in-Class:
Your Backlog Link Rate: 35%
Best Practice: 40-50%
Gap: 5-15 percentage points
Action: Improve linking workflow
Formula:
Quality Score = (
(Vote Count × 0.4) +
(Comment Count × 0.3) +
(Detail Level × 0.2) +
(Clarity × 0.1)
) / 4
Detail Level: 0-10 (based on description length/completeness)
Clarity: 0-10 (subjective or NLP-based)
Use Cases:
Formula:
Influence Score = (
(Feedback Submitted × 1) +
(Votes Given × 0.5) +
(Comments Made × 0.7) +
(Items Implemented × 2)
)
Interpretation:
Formula:
F2F Ratio = (Features Shipped from Feedback / Total Feedback) × 100
Example:
Total Feedback: 500 items
Features Shipped: 75 items
F2F Ratio: (75 / 500) × 100 = 15%
Benchmarks:
First Response Rate:
FRR = (Items with Response / Total Items) × 100
Target: >95%
Resolution Rate:
RR = (Completed + Resolved Items / Total Items) × 100
Target: Steady increase, >50% after 6 months
Time to Resolution:
TTR = Average time from submission to completion
Varies by priority:
- Critical: <7 days
- High: <30 days
- Medium: <90 days
- Low: <180 days
Key Metrics:
1. Total Feedback (trend)
2. Top 5 Feature Requests (by votes)
3. Critical Issues Count
4. Backlog Link Rate
5. Customer Satisfaction Proxy (engagement)
Frequency: Monthly
Format: Visual dashboard with charts
Insights:
Key Metrics:
1. Rising Items (last 30 days)
2. Category Distribution
3. Segment-Specific Requests
4. Backlog Alignment
5. Feature Request Themes
Frequency: Weekly
Format: Detailed report with analysis
Insights:
Key Metrics:
1. Response Time Trends
2. Unprocessed Count
3. Customer-Specific Feedback
4. At-Risk Accounts (low engagement)
5. Champion Accounts (high engagement)
Frequency: Weekly
Format: Action-oriented list
Insights:
Key Metrics:
1. Bug Reports (by severity)
2. Technical Debt Items
3. Performance Issues
4. Integration Requests
5. Backlog Progress
Frequency: Daily/Weekly
Format: Prioritized list
Insights:
CSV Export:
Fields:
- ID, Title, Description
- Type, Category, Status
- Votes, Comments
- Created Date, Updated Date
- User Segment, User Email
- Backlog Link
Use Cases:
API Access:
GET /feedback-items?filters=...
Returns: JSON array of items
Use: Custom integrations, automation
Supported Tools:
Integration Methods:
Custom Dashboards:
Create visualizations:
- Trend charts
- Heatmaps
- Funnel analysis
- Cohort retention
- Segment comparison
Indicators:
Low engagement score (declining)
No feedback in 60+ days
Declining vote activity
Unresolved critical issues
Approaching renewal date
Risk Score:
Risk Score = (
(Days Since Last Activity × 0.3) +
(Unresolved Critical Issues × 0.4) +
(Engagement Score Decline × 0.3)
)
High Risk: >70
Medium Risk: 40-70
Low Risk: <40
Pre-Launch Indicators:
High vote count (>100)
Multiple customer segments requesting
Rising trend (not just old item)
Clear, well-defined request
Alignment with strategy
Success Probability:
High (>80%): All indicators positive
Medium (50-80%): Most indicators positive
Low (<50%): Few indicators positive
Volume Forecasting:
Method: Linear regression on historical data
Formula: y = mx + b
Use: Resource planning, capacity management
Example:
Historical: 100, 120, 140, 160 items/month
Trend: +20 items/month
Forecast: Next month = 180 items
Criteria:
High votes (>50)
Low effort (engineering estimate)
Clear requirements
Multiple segments requesting
Not currently on roadmap
Quick Win Score:
QW Score = (Vote Count × Segment Count) / Effort Estimate
Example:
Votes: 80
Segments: 3
Effort: 5 (days)
QW Score: (80 × 3) / 5 = 48
High Score (>40): Prioritize
Medium Score (20-40): Consider
Low Score (<20): Defer
Characteristics:
Moderate votes (20-50)
High comment activity (>10)
Detailed discussions
Technical feasibility confirmed
Strategic alignment
Why Hidden:
Discovery Method:
1. Filter: Discussed tab
2. Review high-comment items
3. Read discussions for depth
4. Evaluate strategic fit
5. Consider despite lower votes
Clustering Similar Feedback:
Manual Method:
1. Group by category
2. Read titles for themes
3. Identify common keywords
4. Create theme tags
Automated Method (if available):
NLP-based clustering
Keyword extraction
Similarity scoring
Automatic grouping
Pattern Examples:
Pattern: "Mobile app performance"
Items: 15 separate submissions
Action: Create epic, link all items
Pattern: "Export to Excel"
Items: 8 requests from enterprise segment
Action: Prioritize for enterprise tier
Daily:
✅ Check volume trends
✅ Monitor response times
✅ Review unprocessed count
Weekly:
✅ Analyze rising items
✅ Review segment engagement
✅ Update team reports
Monthly:
✅ Trend analysis
✅ Executive reporting
✅ Strategic planning
Quarterly:
✅ Cohort analysis
✅ Benchmark review
✅ Process optimization
✅ Consistent categorization - Accurate analysis
✅ Complete metadata - Rich insights
✅ Regular cleanup - Remove duplicates
✅ Validate exports - Ensure data integrity
✅ Visualize data - Charts over tables
✅ Tell stories - Context over numbers
✅ Actionable recommendations - What to do next
✅ Regular cadence - Consistent reporting
Excel/Google Sheets:
Pivot Tables: Category distribution
Charts: Trend visualization
Formulas: Custom calculations
Conditional Formatting: Highlight patterns
Example Analysis:
1. Export feedback to CSV
2. Create pivot table by category
3. Add vote count sum
4. Create bar chart
5. Identify top categories
Custom Analysis:
-- Top categories by vote count
SELECT category, SUM(votes) as total_votes
FROM feedback_items
WHERE created_at > DATE_SUB(NOW(), INTERVAL 30 DAY)
GROUP BY category
ORDER BY total_votes DESC
LIMIT 10;
Correlation Analysis:
Question: Does engagement correlate with retention?
Method: Calculate correlation coefficient
Data: Engagement score vs. renewal rate
Significance Testing:
Question: Is the improvement statistically significant?
Method: T-test or Chi-square
Data: Before/after process change
Advanced analytics transforms raw feedback data into strategic insights. Regular analysis helps you stay ahead of trends, make data-driven decisions, and demonstrate the value of your feedback program to stakeholders.